AI-Based Attacks
,
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
,
Cybercrime
Global Cyber Alliance: as AI Fuels Cybercrime, Outcomes Keep Getting Worse
Security leaders have spent years expanding controls, improving hygiene and building partnerships. Adoption is up. Cooperation is broader. Despite that, phishing, scams and fraud continue to surge.
See Also: Proof of Concept: Bot or Buyer? Identity Crisis in Retail
Brian Cute, interim CEO of the Global Cyber Alliance, says the problem lies how success is defined. Attackers optimize for volume, speed and cost. Defensive programs, in contrast, often measure participation and incremental improvement – metrics that don’t translate into friction for criminal operations.
“When you consider the increase in volume in the last couple years and think forward, what’s coming at us is a literal tsunami of more effective scams, more effective phishing attacks, coupling that with deepfake technology and the improvement in click-through rates, the reduction in costs for cybercriminals, this is going to be a scourge. We are not prepared,” Cute said.
In a video interview with Information Security Media Group, Cute discussed:
- Why defensive progress hasn’t affected attacker outcomes;
- How artificial intelligence magnifies gaps in traditional security models;
- What changes when success is measured by impact.
Cute, interim CEO and COO of the Global Cyber Alliance, also leads the capacity and resilience program, which focuses on democratizing cybersecurity by delivering free, practical resources that help communities strengthen resilience and reduce cyber risk. A respected voice in internet governance, Cute brings leadership experience from ICANN and the Public Interest Registry, along with deep experience working with global communities to understand how trust, safety and access shape internet use.

